7.10.08

Death Penalty On Agenda

Following a tragic double-murder, capital punishment has surged as an election issue. There now appears a real possibility that right-wing candidate Randy Jefferson, running on a "Do the Crime, pay the Penalty" platform, will gain power. While society's intelligentsia is outraged, debate rages as to whether the government should intervene.

Option 1: "This is a democracy, remember?" rhetorically questions Professor May O'Bannon of the University of Greater East Pac Nation. "That means that if the people want something, the people get it. I hate to say it, but in the name of political freedom, we need to accept that our country will have the death penalty."

Option 2:
"I'm sorry," says Civil Rights Unionist Elizabeth Gutenberg, "but this travesty cannot be allowed to pass. If the government needs to crack down on lunatic fringe groups in order to keep our great nation free of the death penalty, then so be it. We must ban the politics of hatred and fear!"


OR


Dismiss this issue.

3 comments:

RiccardoPu said...

option1 death penalty

this has me torn.
who are we to decide who lives and dies?

i would rather have there be no death penalty and instead the prisoners have to be a max lock down prison where they arent given all these luxuries that prisoners get today which at times i think is wrong.
everything is circumstantial but you cant fully eliminate the death penalty, just avoid it. there are times when it is necessary.

RiccardoPu said...

idk if my comment went through but im for the death penalty
torn about it though

Anonymous said...

I believe we should have the death penalty. I'm a very Christian person, and the Bible even says to cut something off it it cause you to sin. If someone is killing people, cut them off. Kill them; that's the only way they're going to really know they have to repent. If they start groveling and crying, and look repentant, put them in jail for a while. If not, to the gallows they go!